Tagged: church

February 17th, 2009

The Wonderful World of Twitter

It’s just after lunch, and staff meeting went well this morning. After stumbling over the question, “How is Twitter different from a Facebook status (and why is it better)?” my bosses jumped on the Twitter train. Thankfully, one had read last night’s post about this morning’s meeting, so he was prepared for my Twitter diatribe.

Just as most people are when we try something new, the bosses were hesitantly cautious with their new accounts, and this made me realize that as easy as Twitter is, it’s seriously overwhelming to newbies, more so, I think, than Facebook. So I’m thinking of two documents/blog posts: one named “Twitter for LifePointers” for generally helping our people get the most out of what LPC offers on Twitter and another doc for leadership that outlines best practices for tweeting in the context of the church. Many of my friends have pending Twitter 101 posts, and I’ll definitely use their two cents in putting together these documents, but here are some initial thoughts for each:

Twitter for LifePointers

  • Setting up an account
  • Finding people to follow, who not to follow (recognizing spatters? spitters? we need to coin a phrase for spam tweeters)
  • @replies, direct messages, re-tweets, hash marks, and tiny URLs
  • Setting up your phone/phone apps
  • Setting up extra-Twitter apps like Facebook

Best Twitter Practices at LPC

  • Setting up a ministry account (naming conventions, mostly). I want all LPC ministry accounts to be similar (maybe with the simple prefix lpc_ministryname) so our people can more easily recognize the legitimate LPC Twitter accounts.
  • Who to follow/not follow. Following some advice from another Twittering church, I’m limiting who LPC follows to our ministry partners (out of the church), our members (in the church), and our neighbors in the Ozarks. Essentially, I want who we follow to be a source for LPCers to find other people we know or think they should know. If our partners, members, and neighbors follow us, we’ll gladly reciprocate (within reason, of course. If an Ozarkian follows us and their tweets are not appropriate–and I mean, seriously not appropriate–we won’t follow them and we may block them).
  • What can/should be tweeted?
  • Managing Twitter accounts with third-party apps

I realize the Twitter for LifePointers looks like a generic how-to document, but I plan to add LPC-specific notes to it (i.e. if you’re a parent of a youth, consider following the youth account, so the youth pastor can keep you in the loop of what’s going on).

Beyond that, do you all have any ideas for these docs or for educating our people and leaders on the wonderful world of Twitter?

December 6th, 2008

Would You Use a Dynamic Liturgical Theme for Your Church Blog?

I seriously thought this was a joke when it was posted on Weblog Tools Collection, but it’s for real: A WordPress theme that follows the liturgical calendar and adjusts the colors of your blog accordingly. The Liturgical Year Theme, by Scott Lenger, is for churches (and I guess, individuals) who follow the liturgical calendar and decorate their sanctuaries accordingly. The rationale is, if you change your church’s physical decor, why not change the website’s?

As a church web developer, I have mixed feelings. For full disclosure, I’ve never attended a church that followed the liturgical calendar, so I have no personal experience with liturgically-decorated santuaries. On one hand, I think it’s a great idea, in theory. I like websites that are dynamic in content and design, and when design decisions are made for a reason–in this case, to acknowledge the liturgical calendar on the Web–I’m more likely to agree with those decisions. On the other hand, a website is part of a church’s overall brand identity, and I’m afraid messing with the colors will conflict with that brand. Or the website might start looking like clown pants.

So I won’t be using this theme at work, but if you are using or know of a site that is using it, will you post the link in a comment? I’d love to at least see this theme at work!

April 28th, 2008

Barna Releases Results of Latest Study: Use of Technology in Churches

The Barna Group released the results of its latest study on how churches use technology today. Even though Barna is on my bad list for not having an RSS feed, I still stay up to date on the studies they release. Today’s study was interesting to me because I work at a church and handle a lot of the technology. Here’s a summary of the summary:

In America, Protestant churches are continuing to recognize the influence emerging technology can have on the lives of their members. Between 2000 and 2005, the use of this technology increased the most, so in the last two years, the adoption of this technology has leveled off.

Barna studied eight technologies and applications:

  1. Large projection screens
  2. Movie/video clips
  3. Email blasts
  4. Websites
  5. Blogs
  6. Social networking sites
  7. Podcasts
  8. Satellite dishes

Most churches (65%) have large projection screens, but the smaller the church the less likely it is to have such a screen. Additionally, over half of churches have shown movie clips and videos during their services and events.

Likewise, most churches (62%) have websites, too, but again, the smaller the church, the less likely it is to utilize that technology. Churches also utilize other Internet tools; 26% use a social networking site, 16% podcast, and 13% have a blog.

I’m glad to see that LifePoint is on pace with the rest of churches in America. Not that we should measure ourselves against other churches; we should only measure ourselves against what Christ has called LPC to be, but this study is a good barometer of what is happening in churches around the country.

 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up