Tagged: lifepoint

December 1st, 2009

Big Big News! I Mean, Monumental!

It’s official! I will be teaching English 101 (Composition I) at Ozarks Technical Community College in the spring! I will be teaching two online 16-week classes starting in January and then adding two more online 8-week block classes in March (providing that they meet enrollment requirements, of course).

In related news, I’ve given notice at LifePoint. I’ll be seeing us through our move to our new facility in January/February and training a replacement(s), but my last day will be March 1. I know, it’s a lot of notice to give, but I want the leadership at LPC to have plenty of time to transition to the new facility and have time to find a new office gal (or guy).

So that’s my big news! (I bet some of you thought I was going to announce I was pregnant. On a side note, I think it would be really awesome to be early in a pregnancy around an April 1, so I could announce that I’m pregnant on April Fool’s Day, and everyone would think that I’m joking. THAT would be hilarious. Regardless, there is no baby news. Period.)

OK. Votey vote. Brilliantly creative? Gigantic idiot? Choice is yours:

Gigantic IdiotBrilliantly Creative (+2 rating, 2 votes)
Loading ... Loading ...
February 27th, 2009

Pew Provides Twitter Demographics & Insight for Church Use

Man, I’ve been reading a ton of crazy awesome stuff this week. My brain is going to explode. Well, actually, that’s what this blog is for, brain shrapnel. (That would make an awesome blog title. I should buy the domain name.)

Today’s reading isn’t really all that new, especially in Internet terms. February 12, the Pew Internet & American Life Project released a study on the use of Twitter by online adults. You probably heard all about it two weeks ago, but I’m reading it for the first time. (And BTW, a huge thanks to Pew for their incredible research project. I think half of my thesis sources were from them.)

First off, my one beef with this study: Pew’s definition of Twitter includes “use of status messages or mood and location messages on a social network site.” While I agree that all these tweets and status updates are virtually the same thing, calling them all Twitter is misleading. But now you know. Let’s get to the good stuff.

Not surprisingly, Twitter has been most embraced by young adults, 18-24 and 25-34. Perfect, that will be my argument for getting the twentysomethings at LPC to get on Twitter. But let’s think about it. Five years ago when Facebook launched, it was launched to the public, the older young adults were in college–Facebook’s target. And the younger group was in high school, Facebook’s second target. It’s also important to note that after age 35, the use of Twitter drops to 10%. That means I’ll have to work on getting many of the parents at LPC to use these services.

Another big “surprise,” Twitterers are more likely to use wireless devices when making updates. In fact 76% of them use the Internet wirelessly (17), and they’re more likely to use their cell phones to text and go online than the rest of the cell-phone using population. When we get bored, we whip out the laptop or iPhone and see what everyone else is up to online. If LPC’s people aren’t wireless in one form or another, the chances that they’re going to tweet are slim. Good to know.

I love this: “The use of Twitter is highly intertwined with the use of other social media; both blogging and social network use increase the likelihood that an individual also uses Twitter” (9). I could’ve told you that. Social media is like crack. You start blogging, then you start reading other people’s blogs, then you follow them on Twitter or friend them on Facebook, and before you know it you’ve made friends with people you don’t even know (Hi, lifestudent and Lorraine!)

Pew presents a “portrait of a Twitter user” (12) and gives some key demographic information on Twitterers. For one, their median age is 31 (13), right around the median age at LifePoint. They’re also more racially and ethnically diverse, but that’s because the youngest American young adults are more diverse than the rest of the population (14). Twitterers can mostly be found in urban areas (35%), which is probably due to better Internet, wireless, and cell phone services in those areas. Because let’s face it, if you are using dialup in your rural neck of the woods, the last thing you want to do is waste time and bandwidth telling other people what you are doing, which is waiting for pages to load. Ozark presents a challenge. In the last 15 years, it’s grown from very rural to nearly urban. Internet and cell phone services have kept up, but there are many people who still live in what we call “the sticks.” Not that they’re rednecks or anything, but once you get out of city limits, Internet service often goes down the drain. And so does their Twittering.

Twitterers like getting their news on their mobile devices, and they’re less likely to use traditional media (like physical newspapers) to get their news. If this isn’t an argument to communicate LifePoint news via Twitter, I don’t know what is. Pew wraps up their report with this:

Twitter users engage with new and own technology at the same rates as other Internet users, but the ways in which they use the technology–to communicate, gather, and share information–reveals their affinity for mobile, untethered, and social opportunities for interaction. … Twitter … enhances these opportunities (22).

So I guess the key is to get our people the information they want so they can “communicate, gather, and share” it. The question remains, Are we providing the information that they want? I’d like to think we are, but it’s tough to tell. Communication around here seems to be one way, and there aren’t very many two-way conversations regarding the information we provide. Good thing? Bad thing? I’m not sure.

February 26th, 2009

Frazzle Rock: My New TV Show

If I could create a TV show based on my day, I would call it “Frazzle Rock.” I have been frazzled all day long, and it would be a good day to live underground and eat radishes. My day has been insane since my first step into the office today, and on top of that, I had a cup of coffee this morning, so I’m jittery on top of everything else.

First, a quick update on my meeting with the youth guy last night: CB was totally onboard with Twitter, and he started getting the youth to sign up last night. Introduced him to HootSuite and TweetDeck and got the youth account set up. I’m excited to see how he’ll be using it to stay in touch with the students and their parents. On to my Thursday…

My first joy of the morning was a note from my boss to return some books that we had purchased for the resource wall. We’re in the middle of a sermon series about the family, so the wall is covered with books about marriage, sex, parenting, kids, teens, etc. To his dismay last night, the boss noticed that the book titled “How to Talk to Your Kids About Sexuality” was endorsed by Ted Haggard. Eek! Granted, the book was published long before the incident, but as a church, we simply can’t recommend books with that kind of endorsement.

And women’s Bible study was this morning, which was fine and I love having the moms and their kids in the building, but when you’re already frazzled, more activity is not what you need. Once the building cleared out, I was able to tackle my set of Thursday tasks. Then I got a series of phone calls from miscellaneous people asking a variety of different things of me, and I hadn’t had lunch, so I was not only jittery but getting grouchy.

Ate lunch, took 30 minutes to just sit and breathe, and then I had a meeting with Linden to discuss our Twitter project. I really didn’t think we had too much to discuss, but I have quite a few notes. We discussed the audience and scope of our project and nailed down some goals for it. Not sure when or where we’ll release it to the public, but we think it will be a good resource for those who are brand new to Twitter and haven’t figured it out, whether for personal or business use. It was awesome to talk to Linden (gotta love Google voice chat), but we both agreed it will be tons better when we’re both on the same continent.

After wrapping up some loose ends in the office, I took some notes and brainstormed for a creative communications meeting tonight. Web development falls under creative comm along with photography, design, video, and production at LifePoint, and the leaders of all those areas are meeting tonight for coffee. I have seven minutes to hit the highlights of web development, and my three main points are

  1. Twitter implementation
  2. Sermon archiving
  3. Redemption story writing

I’ll also be commenting on specific challenges I’m facing right now, which are training my volunteers to take some of my web development load and creating fresh content for the web site. And then we’re brainstorming for the next sermon series on Ruth; I have some ideas, but they’re in no way related to web development.

Now wouldn’t you all watch a TV show of me in my cave-office going about my day? Granted, I’d be a bit muppet-ish, but that’s part of the fun!

February 24th, 2009

Vintage Church Challenges Churches to Rethink Technology

driscoll-vintage-churchI hyped up Mark Driscoll and Gerry Breshears’ new book Vintage Church last week when it arrived in the office, so I thought I’d pass along my thoughts on chapter eleven, “How Can a Church Utilize Technology?” I’m sure the rest of the book was awesome, but I’m on a technology kick right now, so I only read the one chapter before passing it on to the boss.

The chapter wasn’t exactly what I expected. Naturally, I was hoping for more Internet insights, but mostly the chapter was about technology in worship services and such. A lot of the chapter can still apply to me, though. First off, I loved this quote, “No matter what the medium, the message needs to be clear” (271). Can I get a “Woot!” for the five pillars of technical communication? (They are clarity, accuracy, brevity, organization, and ethical, for the record.) In case you haven’t figured it out, the message is always the gospel even when the message is an announcement about a roller skating party.

Driscoll and Breshears also advocated “stickiness,” allowing the content generated by the church (sermons, music, etc.) to be accessed for more than one Sunday, one geographical area at one time. The Internet enables the church to increase its influence when the church makes its resources–those sermons, songs, etc.–available online. By doing so, the Internet is the new “front door” to the church and lets people visit the church before gracing it with their physical presence. I’m not looking for a new church home, but if I were, the first place I’d go in my search is the Internet, and because I’m such an eSnob, if the church doesn’t have a decent website with a few essential functions (i.e. service times, maps, ministry descriptions, etc.), I’m not likely to visit that church in person.

I knew this, but it was good to read it: “The preached Word is the most important aspect of the church service. … It is also the most visible and distinguishing aspect of a church” (273). These sentences alone challenged me to rethink my priorities in web development at LPC. If the preached Word is the most visible and distinguishing part of the church, then more than likely, that’s the number one deciding factor in whether a visitor decides to stick around. We have sermon archives on the LPC web site, but I wonder if there’s more we can do…

Another fantastic quote:

No matter what you do, you will draw some people and repel others, so don’t be grieved when you lose people. Rather, decide whom you intend to draw and whom you are willing to repel (273-274).

Those are tough words. No one, not even a church, wants to be rejected; furthermore, I don’t think any church would want to admit that there are some people they want to repel. Icky. But at the same time, that’s why, based upon my understanding of the church, God initiated the local church in Acts. Every church has its own “church-ality,” and just like people are drawn to certain personalities, so are people to certain churches. Other churches aren’t better or worse. They’re just different.

That said, churches need to attract people, which requires name recognition in the community (275) and invitations via personal relationships and the Web (276). In Ozark, LifePoint has built a rapport with the community, but outside Ozark and into Springfield, we get mixed up with NorthPoint Church. We don’t have a PR department (or if we do, that’s me), so we don’t do any press releases and barely have any advertising, but the word-of-mouth approach seems to work well for us. Of course, we’ll probably do a big PR push when we move into the new building. Naturally, that’s going to get a lot of attention from the community. (So if anyone reading this is a PR person and goes to LPC, I need your help.)

Driscoll and Breshears also encouraged us to experiment before committing to any technology, whether it’s online or in the production booth. We’re also to visit other churches and businesses for ideas, hire consultants, and count the cost of new technology on our time, staff, and finances before committing. Most importantly, I thought, we’re to use technology as a tool. Lane always says, “We don’t use people to get ministry done. We use ministry to get people done.” I think the same goes for technology.

Technology is a tool for the church to connect with people and provide them with gospel content about Jesus. Now more than ever, churches that want to reach out effectively to lost people, particularly young people, don’t necessarily need to love technology but must learn to use it to connect with people they love. Any church that is willing to use technology well is demonstrating love by approaching lost people in a way they are accustomed to. this technological hospitality is the practical outpouring of Jesus’ love for our neighbor (281).

I love technological hospitality. It’s like LifePoint’s web presence needs to feel like my living room: comfy couches, lit candles, fresh cookies, NPR playing in the background, and snuggly cats to lower your blood pressure. (OK, maybe not my living room, but a figurative living room. Maybe Lori O’Dell’s.)

Lots and lots to think about. I love it.

February 18th, 2009

Twitter is a Battlefield

Yeah, I don’t know what it means either, but I figure if love is a battlefield, Twitter can be, too. Mostly admin stuff this morning, and I spent the afternoon following up with my two web development volunteers. That’s an adjustment. I’ve done the LPC web development essentially by myself for almost five years, and handing over tasks (and thus, control) are not easy for me, but delegating gives me more time to work on things like Twitter projects and other things I love. And I’m learning that when you lead volunteers, you still have to check on what they’re doing and give them feedback. And today, I had to write a set of instructions for one of my coordinator positions. It took most of the afternoon, but it was time well spent.

Linden and I started collaborating on a Twitter guide for our beginner friends. It’s long. And we’ve barely scratched the surface. It’s either going to be a huge blog post (or series) or it might morph into an eBook, which would be cool. Hopefully, I can put in some time working on it tomorrow afternoon.

And the hubby Chris has a blog. He’s been working on it all week. He’s so cute! It’s hosted on a subdomain of SarahJoAustin.com, so until we get him a real domain name, I won’t tell you how to find it (it’s not ready anyway). But I can’t wait for you to read it!

And something else happened that was awesome, but it’s not completely finished. Let’s just say that someone who is pretty important in the online world and I have been emailing about a project. Hopefully, I’ll have more tomorrow about that!

February 17th, 2009

The Wonderful World of Twitter

It’s just after lunch, and staff meeting went well this morning. After stumbling over the question, “How is Twitter different from a Facebook status (and why is it better)?” my bosses jumped on the Twitter train. Thankfully, one had read last night’s post about this morning’s meeting, so he was prepared for my Twitter diatribe.

Just as most people are when we try something new, the bosses were hesitantly cautious with their new accounts, and this made me realize that as easy as Twitter is, it’s seriously overwhelming to newbies, more so, I think, than Facebook. So I’m thinking of two documents/blog posts: one named “Twitter for LifePointers” for generally helping our people get the most out of what LPC offers on Twitter and another doc for leadership that outlines best practices for tweeting in the context of the church. Many of my friends have pending Twitter 101 posts, and I’ll definitely use their two cents in putting together these documents, but here are some initial thoughts for each:

Twitter for LifePointers

  • Setting up an account
  • Finding people to follow, who not to follow (recognizing spatters? spitters? we need to coin a phrase for spam tweeters)
  • @replies, direct messages, re-tweets, hash marks, and tiny URLs
  • Setting up your phone/phone apps
  • Setting up extra-Twitter apps like Facebook

Best Twitter Practices at LPC

  • Setting up a ministry account (naming conventions, mostly). I want all LPC ministry accounts to be similar (maybe with the simple prefix lpc_ministryname) so our people can more easily recognize the legitimate LPC Twitter accounts.
  • Who to follow/not follow. Following some advice from another Twittering church, I’m limiting who LPC follows to our ministry partners (out of the church), our members (in the church), and our neighbors in the Ozarks. Essentially, I want who we follow to be a source for LPCers to find other people we know or think they should know. If our partners, members, and neighbors follow us, we’ll gladly reciprocate (within reason, of course. If an Ozarkian follows us and their tweets are not appropriate–and I mean, seriously not appropriate–we won’t follow them and we may block them).
  • What can/should be tweeted?
  • Managing Twitter accounts with third-party apps

I realize the Twitter for LifePointers looks like a generic how-to document, but I plan to add LPC-specific notes to it (i.e. if you’re a parent of a youth, consider following the youth account, so the youth pastor can keep you in the loop of what’s going on).

Beyond that, do you all have any ideas for these docs or for educating our people and leaders on the wonderful world of Twitter?

February 16th, 2009

The Pandora’s Box of Twitter

I was a little cryptic in last night’s post about Church 2.0 and all that’s been rolling around in my head. I’m not going to give you a lot of background because that will take too long, and I want to problem solve in the here and now.

Twitter is the object of my affection, devotion, obsession right now. I use it personally and professionally. In the year or so I’ve tweeted, I’ve mostly used Twitter for posting blog updates and Facebook statuses, but in the last month or so, my use of Twitter as a networking and communicating tool has probably tripled. Maybe even quadrupled. And the more I use it, the more I see how it can be used at LifePoint.

Anthony Coppedge released his ebook The Reason Your Church Must Twitter earlier this year, and after paying the $5 to download it, I ate it up in one sitting. And then my head exploded.

In the context of the church, Twitter is excellent as a megaphone for tweeting announcements and other tidbits of information that need to get out fast. Yes, faster than email. Text message fast. In the context of LifePoint, I’m thinking multiple Twitter accounts: at least one for each key ministry, so young adults can get updates about young adult stuff and youth with youth stuff and parents with kid stuff. At LPC, that’s easily 7-10 Twitter accounts.

Twitter is also good for conversation, which is how I’ve been using it lately. If I can tell you what I need to say in 140 character or less, I’m tweeting you. Not emailing. Not texting. Not calling. I read yesterday about a church that had a “Twitter Sunday.” They encouraged the entire congregation to bring their laptops (or iPhones) and respond to the worship and sermon and service as it was happening. The tweets were displayed live on screens in the worship room. Definitely not sure if LPC is ready for that, but maybe we could start by live tweeting our services with the main ideas of the sermon and song titles and such. We could go one step further by encouraging people to ask questions about the sermon topic and feeding those to the pastor.

And speaking of the pastors (and other leadership), what a great way for them to build repoire with our people by conversing! I hear so often that people love that LifePoint is so friendly and that they’re looking for a smaller church where they can get to know everyone (including the pastor). But let’s face it, we’re at 300 people right now, and our leaders can’t have personal, one-on-one relationships with everyone. It’s just not possible, but Twitter can help.

I’m taking the worship service idea to staff meeting tomorrow. Chris is volunteering his time to live tweet during the 10:40 service since I teach the kiddos. Our lead pastor just got a BlackBerry, and I’m praying I can get him on the Twitter train.

So much to do. See how I’m overwhelmed? It’s like a Pandora’s box.  I need a plan. I guess my first task is getting the pastors on board. Then the worship experience tweeting. Then getting a few of our key leaders to tweet. Then I’ll need more web development help. Ugh. That’s another post…

P.S. And in case you’re not a Twitterer (you should be), did you know you can follow a tweeter on your cellphone without a Twitter account? Text ‘follow username’ (i.e. ‘follow sarahjoaustin’) to 40404, and you’ll get their updates. Standard text messaging rates apply, of course.

February 15th, 2009

New Church 2.0 Category

Quick post tonight because I need to leave for community group in 15 minutes. I’m starting a new category on A Fool of Myself. I need a place to brainstorm, write, and muse about what I’m encountering in the school of what’s been dubbed Church 2.0 (or what church looks like in light of Web 2.0). As many of you know, in addition to my administrative responsibilities at LifePoint, I’m our web development chick, but what you may not know is that my Master’s thesis was about Church 2.0. Consider this continuation of my research. Heck, I might even post my thesis for the world to read.

Today I’m struggling/chewing on Twitter. I love Twitter. And the more I read and think and read and think, the more possibilities I see for LifePoint on Twitter. But let’s face it, I tend to be on the bleeding edge of these things, and I need to make it very palatable to LPC’s leaders before they’ll take hold of it. (Sort of like Facebook a year ago.) But leading people is really hard for me. I’m not one who moves masses of people. But if I can get the leadership on board, the masses will soon follow. (I realize that I sound like a Communist or something.)

Anyway, I just need a place to think. And I don’t know how much I’ll be writing, so I don’t want to add another blog to my plate. I have plenty to say and more resources than I can keep track of right now. Stay tuned!

October 6th, 2008

Busy, Busy Beaver

Is it bad when I start to get used to insanity? Seriously. I’ve been so busy, I’m almost used to it. I don’t know what to do with myself. Here’s what I’ve been up to:

  • Curtains: sewing and hanging at LifePoint. The worship room looks incredible.
  • Engagement: my college roommate and Chris’s best friend got engaged on Thursday night, and we hung out with them and some others on Saturday night to watch the Mizzou game. We’re going wedding dress shopping tonight!
  • LifePoint’s fourth anniversary: all day Sunday. Ugh. I was so tired, but I think I got some great photos. Sometimes I think I’m crazy for devoting so much time to LifePoint, but there’s nothing else I’d rather be doing even if I wasn’t getting paid!
  • Mold: no, it’s not gone yet, but things are moving in the right direction.

Husband? Gee, Chris and I have been meeting each other coming and going. He’s even busier than I am b/c he’s actually responsible for so more than I am at LPC. We could use a night out, but money is tight, so who knows when that might happen. Heck, I’d even take a night in with Scrabble, a movie, and home-made espressos at some point this week!

Running? Eh. No, it’s not been happening, but I want it to. Thinking that if I want to do a marathon this fall/winter, I might need to get a coach–someone to keep me on track for my mid-week runs and long runs (even if they can’t run with me). If you’re one of my readers and you might be interested in fulfilling this role, leave a comment.

 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up