Tagged: technology

February 24th, 2009

Vintage Church Challenges Churches to Rethink Technology

driscoll-vintage-churchI hyped up Mark Driscoll and Gerry Breshears’ new book Vintage Church last week when it arrived in the office, so I thought I’d pass along my thoughts on chapter eleven, “How Can a Church Utilize Technology?” I’m sure the rest of the book was awesome, but I’m on a technology kick right now, so I only read the one chapter before passing it on to the boss.

The chapter wasn’t exactly what I expected. Naturally, I was hoping for more Internet insights, but mostly the chapter was about technology in worship services and such. A lot of the chapter can still apply to me, though. First off, I loved this quote, “No matter what the medium, the message needs to be clear” (271). Can I get a “Woot!” for the five pillars of technical communication? (They are clarity, accuracy, brevity, organization, and ethical, for the record.) In case you haven’t figured it out, the message is always the gospel even when the message is an announcement about a roller skating party.

Driscoll and Breshears also advocated “stickiness,” allowing the content generated by the church (sermons, music, etc.) to be accessed for more than one Sunday, one geographical area at one time. The Internet enables the church to increase its influence when the church makes its resources–those sermons, songs, etc.–available online. By doing so, the Internet is the new “front door” to the church and lets people visit the church before gracing it with their physical presence. I’m not looking for a new church home, but if I were, the first place I’d go in my search is the Internet, and because I’m such an eSnob, if the church doesn’t have a decent website with a few essential functions (i.e. service times, maps, ministry descriptions, etc.), I’m not likely to visit that church in person.

I knew this, but it was good to read it: “The preached Word is the most important aspect of the church service. … It is also the most visible and distinguishing aspect of a church” (273). These sentences alone challenged me to rethink my priorities in web development at LPC. If the preached Word is the most visible and distinguishing part of the church, then more than likely, that’s the number one deciding factor in whether a visitor decides to stick around. We have sermon archives on the LPC web site, but I wonder if there’s more we can do…

Another fantastic quote:

No matter what you do, you will draw some people and repel others, so don’t be grieved when you lose people. Rather, decide whom you intend to draw and whom you are willing to repel (273-274).

Those are tough words. No one, not even a church, wants to be rejected; furthermore, I don’t think any church would want to admit that there are some people they want to repel. Icky. But at the same time, that’s why, based upon my understanding of the church, God initiated the local church in Acts. Every church has its own “church-ality,” and just like people are drawn to certain personalities, so are people to certain churches. Other churches aren’t better or worse. They’re just different.

That said, churches need to attract people, which requires name recognition in the community (275) and invitations via personal relationships and the Web (276). In Ozark, LifePoint has built a rapport with the community, but outside Ozark and into Springfield, we get mixed up with NorthPoint Church. We don’t have a PR department (or if we do, that’s me), so we don’t do any press releases and barely have any advertising, but the word-of-mouth approach seems to work well for us. Of course, we’ll probably do a big PR push when we move into the new building. Naturally, that’s going to get a lot of attention from the community. (So if anyone reading this is a PR person and goes to LPC, I need your help.)

Driscoll and Breshears also encouraged us to experiment before committing to any technology, whether it’s online or in the production booth. We’re also to visit other churches and businesses for ideas, hire consultants, and count the cost of new technology on our time, staff, and finances before committing. Most importantly, I thought, we’re to use technology as a tool. Lane always says, “We don’t use people to get ministry done. We use ministry to get people done.” I think the same goes for technology.

Technology is a tool for the church to connect with people and provide them with gospel content about Jesus. Now more than ever, churches that want to reach out effectively to lost people, particularly young people, don’t necessarily need to love technology but must learn to use it to connect with people they love. Any church that is willing to use technology well is demonstrating love by approaching lost people in a way they are accustomed to. this technological hospitality is the practical outpouring of Jesus’ love for our neighbor (281).

I love technological hospitality. It’s like LifePoint’s web presence needs to feel like my living room: comfy couches, lit candles, fresh cookies, NPR playing in the background, and snuggly cats to lower your blood pressure. (OK, maybe not my living room, but a figurative living room. Maybe Lori O’Dell’s.)

Lots and lots to think about. I love it.

February 23rd, 2009

Youngest Generations Integrate Internet Fastest, Barna Reports

A few notes before my day gets too crazy. The Barna Group is out this morning with a new report on how technology drives the generation gap. I will never be able to afford their actual studies, but the summary had some interesting facts and figures. In sum, they’ve figured out that the youngest of American generations–what they call the Mosaics–is integrating technology into their lives at a faster pace than the older generations. Big surprise there.

And naturally, the 18-24 class and the “Busters” (25-40, I think. The generation after the baby boomers) are integrating more mainstream technology into their lives faster than the Boomers and the “Elders” (the generation before the baby boomers). Everyone, it seems, is using the Internet for email, searching, etc. and across all generations, there seems to be an increase in the creation of personal home pages or blogs, watching TV shows and movies online, and download music. (It’s no wonder, Hulu.com is awesome.) All in all, everyone is becoming more dependent on the Internet.

As a web developer, it’s encouraging to see more and more people going online, and it’s encouraging to know that the generations ahead of me are integrating the Internet into their lives more and more. Of course, I could’ve told you that. My mom, aunt, and mother-in-law are on Facebook (Boomers) and so are my two sisters-in-law (Busters). And my mother-in-law watched 24 online a few weeks ago after Chris and I told her she could catch up on the episodes she missed (we are so proud). Now, if only there were a way to get those generations to stop sending me meaningless email forwards…

I digress. As for me, I’m an ‘82 baby and fall into those transition years between generations. I could be a Buster or a Mosaic, but based upon my use of technology and the importance the Internet plays on my life (it’s sorta my career, so it’s sorta important), I’m gonna go with the Mosaics. My age/generation/enthusiasm presents a challenge in my web development at LifePoint because the Internet is like my fifth appendage, and for those who’ve never had a fifth appendage and have survived quite well without it, it can be difficult to explain the need for it. (That made sense in my head. Did you get the analogy?) The generations ahead of me–many of LPC’s people are Busters and we’re getting more Boomers–need a better reason than, “Because it’s awesome!” to convince them to get on the Internet train. But I’ve always loved a challenge, so we’ll see how this goes.

August 9th, 2008

Phone Cord Art

I have no idea where these photos originated, so I can’t give credit to the proper photographer, but these pictures are so cool that I had to share them. Remember the old phone cords from our childhoods? We had a few of those really long ones that could stretch from one end of the house to the other. Just thinking of them makes me thankful for cordless and cellular phones.

Anyway, some genius took some of these old phone cords and turned them in to art—sheep in fact! Check it out:

The mutton are on display in the Frankfurt Museum of Communications. I can’t read German and the web site isn’t great, so I couldn’t find any information about them or who made them. But aren’t they cool? Thanks to my mom who forwarded these pictures to me!

April 28th, 2008

Barna Releases Results of Latest Study: Use of Technology in Churches

The Barna Group released the results of its latest study on how churches use technology today. Even though Barna is on my bad list for not having an RSS feed, I still stay up to date on the studies they release. Today’s study was interesting to me because I work at a church and handle a lot of the technology. Here’s a summary of the summary:

In America, Protestant churches are continuing to recognize the influence emerging technology can have on the lives of their members. Between 2000 and 2005, the use of this technology increased the most, so in the last two years, the adoption of this technology has leveled off.

Barna studied eight technologies and applications:

  1. Large projection screens
  2. Movie/video clips
  3. Email blasts
  4. Websites
  5. Blogs
  6. Social networking sites
  7. Podcasts
  8. Satellite dishes

Most churches (65%) have large projection screens, but the smaller the church the less likely it is to have such a screen. Additionally, over half of churches have shown movie clips and videos during their services and events.

Likewise, most churches (62%) have websites, too, but again, the smaller the church, the less likely it is to utilize that technology. Churches also utilize other Internet tools; 26% use a social networking site, 16% podcast, and 13% have a blog.

I’m glad to see that LifePoint is on pace with the rest of churches in America. Not that we should measure ourselves against other churches; we should only measure ourselves against what Christ has called LPC to be, but this study is a good barometer of what is happening in churches around the country.

 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up